Glide | greetings - just migrated our stuff over to Devuan (love it) and was curious about setting up another US mirror | 05:31 |
---|---|---|
Glide | we have quite a bit of storage and bandwidth available | 05:31 |
KatolaZ | Glide: hi | 05:39 |
KatolaZ | we would make use of a package mirror in the US | 05:39 |
Glide | cool | 05:40 |
Glide | just point me to a guide and I'll get it set up | 05:40 |
KatolaZ | https://pkgmaster.devuan.org/devuan_mirror_walkthrough.txt | 05:40 |
Glide | I couldn't find one but I assume it's similar to Debian? | 05:40 |
KatolaZ | nope | 05:40 |
KatolaZ | it's not | 05:40 |
Glide | ahh ok | 05:41 |
Glide | cool | 05:41 |
KatolaZ | please go through the walkthrough and feel free to ask here if you need help | 05:41 |
KatolaZ | devuan mirrors are based on redirects | 05:41 |
Glide | how much space is needed? | 05:41 |
Glide | oh | 05:41 |
Glide | I see here, 8GB | 05:41 |
KatolaZ | they directly serve packages forked by devuan, and redirect to a debian mirror for packages coming directly from debian | 05:41 |
KatolaZ | nope | 05:41 |
Glide | ahh ok | 05:41 |
KatolaZ | it's around 20GB | 05:41 |
Glide | oh ok I was expected a lot more | 05:42 |
Glide | *expecting | 05:42 |
Glide | not a problem | 05:42 |
Glide | unrelated - one concern I had | 05:42 |
Glide | with so many distros going systemd, are you guys seeing packages that are completely removing support for sysv, or are making systemd a hard requirement? | 05:43 |
KatolaZ | Glide: there are a few packages that really depend on systemd components | 05:43 |
KatolaZ | and most of those would do with elogind | 05:43 |
KatolaZ | or consolekit | 05:43 |
Glide | ok | 05:44 |
KatolaZ | in Debian it is currently impossible to ship a daemon without a simple initscript | 05:44 |
Glide | ok good | 05:44 |
Glide | I was worried about that | 05:44 |
KatolaZ | if that policy gets changed, we will see | 05:44 |
Glide | I don't get why this cancer keeps spreading like it does | 05:44 |
KatolaZ | :) | 05:44 |
Glide | ok I'll get started on this - thanks for the info | 05:46 |
Glide | anything else you guys need? | 05:47 |
Glide | in terms of storage, hosting, bandwidth, etc. | 05:47 |
KatolaZ | Glide: actually, not much atm | 06:00 |
Glide | ok sounds good | 06:05 |
KatolaZ | thanks Glide | 06:06 |
KatolaZ | Centurion_Dan: you here? | 07:25 |
KatolaZ | https://bugs.devuan.org//cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=290 | 07:25 |
KatolaZ | I built eudev 3.2.7-5 yesterday | 07:26 |
KatolaZ | it was needed for the ppc64el installer | 07:26 |
KatolaZ | but it looks like it is "missing something" wrt the previoud 3.2.7-3 | 07:26 |
KatolaZ | ~previous | 07:26 |
KatolaZ | Centurion_Dan: ^^^ please let me know if you can have a look | 07:27 |
Ji-eF[m] | KatolaZ: Could it be related to things I reported on #devuan yesterday ? ( about lsmod et al. ) | 07:45 |
Centurion_Dan | KatolaZ: What changed?? | 09:32 |
KatolaZ | dunno | 09:56 |
KatolaZ | just the patches you added to avoid hangin I guess | 09:57 |
Centurion_Dan | hmm - I have to do a clean install for a video capture box tonight so I'll install and test it now. | 11:19 |
KatolaZ | ok | 11:23 |
KatolaZ | Centurion_Dan: let me know if the ppc64el mini.iso works | 11:23 |
KatolaZ | I have no way of testing it | 11:23 |
Centurion_Dan | Ok... will probably have to wait a few days as I don't to mess my current talosII install, and I don't yet have kvm working due to a missing dep. | 11:27 |
Centurion_Dan | I can ask over on the talos irc channel for a volunteer. | 11:27 |
KatolaZ | great | 11:32 |
rrq | I need advice re vtap-repos building, if you've time.. | 11:47 |
KatolaZ | rrq: wazzup? | 11:48 |
KatolaZ | rrq: do you have compression-level =9 in gbp.conf? | 11:49 |
rrq | no | 11:50 |
KatolaZ | try adding it | 11:50 |
KatolaZ | rrq: have you made changes to the upstream file? | 11:58 |
rrq | mmm there is no "upstream" | 12:00 |
rrq | or maybe I'm confused? | 12:01 |
KatolaZ | uh? | 12:01 |
KatolaZ | is the package a native one? | 12:01 |
rrq | yes | 12:02 |
KatolaZ | ok | 12:02 |
KatolaZ | so if you make changes, you must bump version | 12:02 |
KatolaZ | in changelog | 12:02 |
rrq | I did that | 12:02 |
KatolaZ | but then you rolled back the change | 12:03 |
KatolaZ | I mean | 12:04 |
KatolaZ | 0.3.1 | 12:04 |
KatolaZ | is the source the same as the one you built before as 0.3.1? | 12:04 |
KatolaZ | you bumped version | 12:05 |
KatolaZ | to 0.3.1 | 12:05 |
rrq | the first attempt at 0.3.1 failed, and I fixed the source, thereafter it has stayed the same | 12:05 |
KatolaZ | then you tried to build | 12:05 |
KatolaZ | nope | 12:05 |
KatolaZ | the source has changed | 12:05 |
KatolaZ | the source for 0.3.1 is already in dak | 12:05 |
KatolaZ | and it's the "broken" one | 12:06 |
KatolaZ | now you are trying to upload another source with the same 0.3.1 version number | 12:06 |
KatolaZ | and dak complainsa | 12:06 |
rrq | well. yes, it has built vtap-source and vtap-binary and fails on vtap-repos | 12:06 |
KatolaZ | s/sa/s | 12:06 |
KatolaZ | the one explained above is the reason why it is complaining | 12:06 |
KatolaZ | the easiest is to bump version to 0.3.2 | 12:06 |
KatolaZ | and rebuild | 12:07 |
KatolaZ | it will work | 12:07 |
rrq | I'll try... | 12:07 |
KatolaZ | rrq: build fixed | 12:14 |
KatolaZ | 0.3.2 is in experimental | 12:14 |
rrq | your skill at reading the future is amazing :) | 12:14 |
rrq | ta | 12:14 |
rrq | I think I understood that one as well, for next time. | 12:15 |
KatolaZ | :D | 12:16 |
KatolaZ | the thing is that the source package gets in the repo first thing during the -repo job | 12:17 |
KatolaZ | so if there is a failure in any of the binary packages, the source package does not get removed | 12:17 |
KatolaZ | (rightfully, I would say) | 12:17 |
Centurion_Dan | KatolaZ: I have a report it boots ok in KVM (hypervisor mode) still waiting for someone to do a bare metal boot | 22:55 |
KatolaZ | great Centurion_Dan | 23:31 |
KatolaZ | ;) | 23:31 |
Centurion_Dan | KatolaZ: BTW, in ceres and I'm assuming that means beowulf, we've inherited apparmor installed by default... I disagree with the reasoning for this and would like to revert that change - it's pulled in by a recommends (but I haven't found where yet). I think apparmor may be a good thing but I don't want it on a minimal system by default. | 23:42 |
Centurion_Dan | What are your thoughts?? | 23:43 |
golinux | I have only heard bitching about apparmor if public opinion counts for anything | 23:49 |
Centurion_Dan | KatolaZ: https://imgur.com/a/K2EosQK - devuan mini.iso on ppc64el ;-) | 23:57 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!