| drwhite | I can't get updates any more. Is there anything wrong with the Devuan files? | 01:55 |
|---|---|---|
| drwhite | I get the error.... | 01:55 |
| drwhite | E: Release file for http://auto.mirror.devuan.org/merged/dists/ascii-security/InRelease is expired (invalid since 20min 3s). Updates for this repository will not be applied. | 01:55 |
| golinux | drwhite: Use deb.devuan.org | 02:22 |
| golinux | And read the ascii release notes. | 02:22 |
| Centurion_Dan | so consolekit has been removed from debian. | 20:31 |
| gnu_srs2 | Regarding policykit-1: Maybe we should make two backends: -elogind and -systemd? | 20:35 |
| gnu_srs2 | To make it usable with Debian | 20:36 |
| gnu_srs2 | +Devuan | 20:36 |
| Centurion_Dan | Debian will already have a working polkit for systemd that should already work with elogind | 20:37 |
| Centurion_Dan | do we know for sure our policykit-1 is different from debians wrt elogind vs systemd? | 20:38 |
| gnu_srs2 | Centurion_Dan: Debian will already have a working polkit for systemd that should already work with elogind: Are you sure, see the latest emails! | 20:40 |
| gnu_srs2 | On debian-init-diversity and debian-devel | 20:41 |
| Centurion_Dan | wrt consolekit - consolekit2 is a fork and continuation of consolekit can and should we package that instead? I can try to spin a package for that. | 20:45 |
| Centurion_Dan | gnu_srs2: can you provide links to the relevant emails? | 20:45 |
| golinux | http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/pipermail/debian-init-diversity/2018-November/date.html | 21:58 |
| KatolaZ | gnu_srs2: I guess it's not needed | 22:04 |
| KatolaZ | at least, we don't need to provide a -systemd backend for sure | 22:05 |
| KatolaZ | from what I unerstood, it looks like the separate backends might not be necessary, if the proposed solution based on co-existing pam modules would eventually work | 22:06 |
| KatolaZ | Centurion_Dan: consolekit was removed from Debian more than 2 years ago | 22:06 |
| KatolaZ | and has been abandoned upstream | 22:06 |
| Centurion_Dan | KatolaZ: So if we want console-kit then we need to package it ourselves. Consolekit2 a continuation fork is still being maintained upstream with patches as new as 11 months ago. It is a direct decendant of consolekit so probably hasn't changed that much. | 22:20 |
| KatolaZ | Centurion_Dan: it's basically dead... | 22:21 |
| Centurion_Dan | https://github.com/ConsoleKit2/ConsoleKit2 | 22:21 |
| Centurion_Dan | It | 22:21 |
| Centurion_Dan | is probably going to be needed if we are going to have a kfreebsd port. | 22:21 |
| Centurion_Dan | https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/ConsoleKit | 22:28 |
| Centurion_Dan | I | 22:32 |
| Centurion_Dan | will package ConsoleKit2 for experimental and see how that goes. | 22:33 |
| gnu_srs2 | Centurion_Dan: What's wrong with continuing with consolekit? | 22:58 |
| Centurion_Dan | consolekit2 is a continuation of consolekit - but with an active upstream | 23:06 |
| Centurion_Dan | there are also lots of interesting issue on the CK2 github project indicating improvements and that there is active interest - including a Systemd free Fedora project... | 23:11 |
| gnu_srs2 | What: A systemd-free Fedora project?, that's not even thinkable! | 23:50 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!